🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding that remarks delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite delivery and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of significant, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of American men winning major titles when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only felt tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the brink of agony. When he finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to use excessive effort to win it. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and never especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {